Written by Tahananmo Editorial Team
Two weeks after this column noted that the Philippines was falling behind in the race for foreign investment, Australia moved.
The Promoting Growth, Resilience, Economic Stability and Sustainability in the Philippines program, known as PROGRESS, was formally launched in Manila on September 22, 2026. The five-year initiative running from 2026 to 2031 provides an AUD 45 million grant, approximately PHP 2 billion, to support targeted reforms to improve the ease of doing business, attract investment, and accelerate priority industries including clean energy, offshore wind, infrastructure, and carbon markets.
Critically, the PHP 2 billion does not have to be repaid. PROGRESS is a grant, not a loan, meaning every peso flows as direct support to Philippine reform and investment facilitation without adding to government debt obligations.
The announcement arrived the same week that institutional investors from AustralianSuper, IFM Investors, Macquarie Asset Management, Pentagreen Capital, and Plenary Group visited Manila to explore energy and infrastructure investment opportunities, backed by Export Finance Australia’s Southeast Asia Investment Financing Facility capable of deploying up to A$2 billion.
For Filipino property investors who have been watching the FDI decline narrative dominate the September market, the Australia story introduces something the recent macro picture has been missing: a specific, named, funded, and time-bound foreign investment commitment in the sectors that most directly drive Philippine property appreciation. This post reads the PROGRESS program through a property investment lens. It connects to our earlier coverage of the Philippines falling behind on FDI and our infrastructure spending delay analysis.
KEY FACT: PROGRESS is a non-repayable AUD 45 million grant from Australia. Priority sectors: renewable energy, offshore wind, infrastructure, carbon markets, and ease of doing business reform. Timeline: 2026 to 2031. Partner agencies: DOF, ARTA, DOE, DTI, DEPDEV.
The PROGRESS program’s four priority areas each carry specific property investment implications:
Renewable energy development and the offshore wind industry were identified as top priorities for PROGRESS funding. The Philippines has among the highest electricity costs in Asia, a structural barrier to manufacturing investment that BDO Capital’s Eduardo Francisco cited as a reason foreign investors are looking elsewhere.
For property investors, this matters through two channels.
First, lower electricity costs directly reduce the operating cost of commercial real estate including offices, malls, and hotels, improving the profitability of the businesses that occupy them and their capacity to pay rent. Lower electricity costs make Philippine commercial real estate more competitive as a location for tenants, supporting the occupancy and rental rates that underpin REIT dividends.
Second, offshore wind infrastructure development creates its own property market effects. The provinces best positioned for offshore wind, including Ilocos Norte, Bataan, and areas along the Philippine coast with strong wind resources, will see industrial zone development, worker housing demand, and logistics infrastructure investment flowing from a successful offshore wind buildout. Energy infrastructure is a property appreciation catalyst in the same way transportation infrastructure is, but with a longer and less visible lead time.
PROGRESS will support infrastructure development as a priority area alongside clean energy. Export Finance Australia’s Southeast Asia Investment Financing Facility, which can deploy up to A$2 billion, is focused on infrastructure and energy projects and was part of the September 8-9 investor delegation that included Macquarie Asset Management and IFM Investors.
Macquarie Asset Management and IFM Investors are among the world’s most sophisticated infrastructure investors. Macquarie has a specific track record in Philippine infrastructure, having been involved in previous tollroad and utility investments. Their renewed interest in the Philippines, visiting in September 2026 alongside the PROGRESS program launch, signals that at least some institutional capital sees a different Philippine investment picture from the one described by BDO Capital’s Francisco two weeks earlier.
The infrastructure investment most directly relevant to property: if Australian institutional capital through IFM, Macquarie, or Export Finance Australia co-invests in Philippine infrastructure projects, those projects accelerate from pipeline to implementation faster than purely government-funded projects that depend on annual appropriations and the procurement bottlenecks that delayed Q1 to Q3 2026 spending. Private infrastructure investment bypasses the government disbursement cycle entirely.
PROGRESS will support reforms that reduce unnecessary barriers, improve regulatory predictability, and lower the cost of doing business. Partner agencies include the Anti-Red Tape Authority, which handles business registration and licensing simplification.
This reform strand addresses the most structural of the barriers that Geronimo Law identified in our FDI analysis: the cost and complexity of doing business in the Philippines. The BDO Capital critique was that the Philippines has liberalized ownership rules without addressing the operating environment. PROGRESS directly targets the operating environment through Anti-Red Tape Authority reforms and regulatory predictability improvements.
For property investors, ease of doing business reforms matter because they determine which businesses choose to set up or expand in the Philippines. More business activity means more office demand, more retail demand, more worker housing demand, and more hospitality demand. The chain from regulatory reform to property market demand is long but it is real and it has been demonstrated repeatedly in Philippine development history: every significant improvement in the operating environment has been followed by increased business investment and, with a lag, increased property demand.
For property investors, the carbon market development is most relevant to agricultural and forested land holdings. Land that generates carbon credits has a value floor that pure agricultural land does not, creating a new investment thesis for rural Philippine land beyond its agricultural productivity. The Philippine carbon market is at an early stage and the timeline to material impact on land values is long, but the PROGRESS commitment to developing it signals policy direction that sophisticated land investors should note.
The Philippines is dealing with real macro challenges in September 2026. Peso at record lows. BSP rate at 5 percent. GDP at 2.3 percent. FDI down 33 percent. Oil at USD 105. These are not manufactured problems and the property market implications are real.
The PROGRESS program and the Australian investor delegation do not solve these challenges. What they do is introduce a specific, named, funded counter-narrative at exactly the moment when the pessimism narrative is most dominant. A market that is maximum-pessimistic and receiving a credible reform commitment from a sophisticated foreign partner is often closer to the bottom of its sentiment cycle than to its continuation.
Property investors with 5 to 10 year horizons are making decisions today about what the Philippine market looks like in 2030 to 2031, the end of the PROGRESS program. A Philippines that has used A$45 million in Australian grant support to meaningfully reform its investment environment, develop offshore wind capacity, and improve infrastructure is a different investment environment from the one described by the September 2026 macro headlines.
The Philippines' curated directory connecting homeowners, architects, interior designers, and property professionals who believe in the beauty of thoughtful living.
BLOG AND INSIGHTS